Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:08

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Largest Horned Dinosaur Ever Found Looks Like It Walked Off a Marvel Set - Indian Defence Review
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How do I change a truck’s engine oil?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What's the difference between a zero shot, a few shot, and a chain of thought prompting?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Walk your way to a sharper mind: How 40 minutes of walking boosts brain size - Times of India
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why has Biden pulled ahead in battleground states and is now projected to win the 2024 presidency?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
A Forgotten Cancer Is Surging in Young People, And Experts Are Puzzled - ScienceAlert